Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Lopez

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Woohookitty 06:10, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Sky Lopez
Note: This article was listed on VfD on July 9, but (despite some discussion) got no votes either way except for the nomination itself. Although that may technically justify deleting the article, I am re-listing it in the hopes of getting a broader response. -- BD2412 talk 19:51, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * (original nomination and discussion follows)

Spam. Stilgar135 9 July 2005 02:33 (UTC)
 * Question. Spam? By what definition?  And why?  Granted, the article is a stub -- and I can rectify that, if that's the only problem.  Otherwise, I'll likely vote against. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 9 July 2005 03:23 (UTC)
 * Spam probably isn't the right word; vanity would be better. If she is notable, and you can write a good article about her, then that seems like the right thing to do; but seeing an empty page with only a name, measurements, and a link to a personal site definitely makes it seem like a vanity page.
 * I would agree with the vanity part. It looks like Kikki Daire would be the same boat, but I did work on that before I called it a night. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 01:18, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * If you can turn it into a good page, more power to you. Stilgar135 01:34, 10 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. She's a very well known and popular pornographic actress, as a google search will quickly confirm. She has starred in several high-budget productions. This article needs to be expanded, not deleted. --Malathion 20:36, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is factual and NPOV.  We do not delete biographies because they are stubs, especially on figures who receive half a million hits on Google.  Hall Monitor 20:43, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely not my thing, but does seem to be notable. Themindset 23:08, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable porn star. 23skidoo 04:16, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable porn star. Capitalistroadster 05:23, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. For reasons mentioned above, including notability. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 06:07, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. With 66 films and a director for 2.  However the article needs to be cleaned up.  Do we really need links to all of those pay sites? Vegaswikian 07:41, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.