Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Racket (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is that the sources now available, not all of which were in place at the time of nomination, mean that the game now meets WP:GNG. Just Chilling (talk) 23:11, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Sky Racket (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not meet notability criteria for WP:GNG or WP:NVG. I cannot find multiple reliable sources that discuss it in detail. ... disco spinster   talk  20:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  20:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  20:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)


 * soft delete/draftify - non notable as of yet. Potential it might be with a few reviews after release, so no prejudice for it to be recreated when the game has some reviews Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify This is TOOSOON but it's possible it could be notable after release. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * In general given how many videogames get preview press and then never are released I am still on the bit too soon bandwagon to change to keep but also recognize that the sources provided below are high quality enough that sticking to draftify isn't quite appropriate at this time either. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, as the game received funding (half a million BRL) from Ancine (Brazilian National Film Agency) they would be prosecuted by the federal government if they didn't release the product. Pglomba (talk) 16:54, 5 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Found sources:      - Bryn (talk)  (contributions) 21:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Just to be fair to the nominator here, Shacknews coverage happened yesterday, and 4 days after this has started. There is that IGN Brasil WP:SIGCOV coverage as well. USA Today is a press release, which is auto-discounted, and Hardcore Gamer is not WP:SIGCOV ("Let us not forget the less serious shoot-’em ups as well, though. An indie shmup in the vein of Air Zonk or Parodius would have been enough to get me interested in it, sure, but having a tanuki luchador as a boss is the type of gleeful insanity that truly sells me on the game. Works every time."). GameZebo is a a bit mediocre in that, but ShackNews and IGN Brasil are enough for now, and it's very likely it will get some coverage post-release to clinch it past WP:THREE. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Pinging  and  for the Shack News and IGN sources check. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:49, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * keep - meets GNG now. The TOOSOON argument was a good one until now. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Bryn, sources helped to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 22:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks like time has solved this one. William2001(talk) 21:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.