Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky serpent heavy fighter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Civilizations_in_Babylon_5. Firsfron of Ronchester 09:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Sky serpent heavy fighter

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No assertion of notability within the larger topic of the series let alone an encyclopedia. No sources. At best should be on a list page. Azhuras (talk) 04:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge (preserving redirect) to a list of ships in Babylon 5. Picking a few ships at random in the Ships section of Template:B5, there are probably several other candidates for a merge to a list. After the merge, however, I would keep the title as a redirect, so users looking for the ship could more easily find the list. —C.Fred (talk) 04:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge or redirect to Civilizations_in_Babylon_5. Not notable enough to go to main Babylon 5 article, no List of Babylon 5 spacecraft article exists. MKFI (talk) 11:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I don't see the usefulness of a redirect. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 06:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I think the "usefulness" of a redirect would come from that fact that seemingly dozens of legitimate article link to this one, so if it's material is going to a list page, those articles could link to that list page. Mathewignash (talk) 13:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Most if not all links come from B5 template. Still, Drazi ships were featured quite often in the series so the article is quite viable search term. I believe a redirect atleast should be retained. MKFI (talk) 14:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * We have a redirect at POV gun, so I don't see why this would be a useless redirect. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:23, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge preserving the redirect, and the history. Cool Hand Luke 14:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge, preserving the redirect and history. The topic of the article does not seem to be notable in and of its own right; a small statement in the Babylon 5 article should be enough. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:23, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.