Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyboard - Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The only keep argument seems to suggest a wish to use this article as the project's documentation, but Wikipedia is not your web host. JohnCD (talk) 17:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Skyboard - Software

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article currently reads like an advertisement and not wikified. Have tagged it for both of these and notability, since it does not suggest the notability of the subject. Cloudbound (formerly Wikiwoohoo) (talk) 15:12, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is software to run network collaboration boards which are driven and stored by a centralized database engine.  Sounds like "project management" under a different fuzz of words.  Article is simply a features list that resembles a tutorial. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete At present unreferenced and no indication of notability. No quick searches help. A bit Spammy. Polargeo (talk) 16:11, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The software is designed to be more than just a "project managment" app. The focus is on user to user interaction with a high level of process management of authorized systems that are apart of the users "skyboard network" to then collaborate and build maps of ideas that can then let the user see different views of how things are structured.  The need for proper documentation for the project is at a all time high.  After 4 years of daily development with no proper documenation manager the current skeleton that is on display here is not showing the whole picture.  Please consider the current write up to be a simple minor draft of drafts.  Like all projects there has to be development time to work out the kinks so the big picture is made.  With a deletion of this current "work in progress" it would yet again slow down the documentation of what is  truely unique.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Burndata (talk • contribs) 23:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)  — Burndata (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * It's not a matter of quality or uniqueness, but of notability. Haakon (talk) 13:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, promotional and no signs of notability. Haakon (talk) 13:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.