Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyburst Illuminations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Katietalk 00:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Skyburst Illuminations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Company claiming (based on entry in local paper) to be "the largest organiser of firework displays in the United Kingdom". One other local paper story & the rest of sources are deadlinks or fail verification. I can find multiple inclusions in business directories but nothing supporting the notability of the company. &mdash; Rod talk 20:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as my searches simply found nothing better and the listed coverage is simply the expected local coverage, nothing outstandingly better. Notifying past taggers (although it seems he's not considerably active) and .  SwisterTwister   talk  06:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:52, 23 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment -- In a small field, it is perhaps not difficult to be the biggest. The article on Reaction Fireworks a compeer, also  has a notability tag on it.  I remain undecided.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 13:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Leaning Delete: The company additionally won the Bristol Post's Family Business of the Year 2012, had this this mention in a national paper, provided fireworks for 2011 and 1999 [Tall Ships' Races], and had this report in Fireworks Mag. It's all rather thin. National fireworks competition participation is NN, but if they'd won, that'd provide some weight...  undefinedHydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)  06:10, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.