Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skydive London


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to British_Parachute_Association. and delete history per consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:22, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Skydive London

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Company without any claim to notability. No refs, only link to company site selling skydiving jumps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmol (talk • contribs)


 * 1) "Merge" - the information may be worth preserving in a related article or list of such places  Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere!  (Whisper...) 11:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Why would we merge this anywhere? What exactly do you believe is worth preserving and where would you suggest it be preserved? -- Whpq (talk) 13:57, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable source to meet notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:57, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORP; I can't see the need for a list of skydiving centres either, that would be akin to having a list of paintball venues or karting centres. YSSYguy (talk) 21:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to British_Parachute_Association. The title may get used by some people as a search term, but this article doesn't saying anything apart from it being a drop zone. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 07:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep skydiving centers are as rare as amusement parks and common as schools both are considered of note and I think this place should be too as long as its sourced, which I say it is.Thisbites (talk) 00:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.