Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skye at waterscapes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Skye at waterscapes

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD. I am unable to find any significant coverage of this article to satisfy WP:RS. I see sites listing the building, but see nothing as far as an assertion of notability goes. ArcAngel (talk) 05:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, promotional. Abductive  (reasoning) 05:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - not especially promotional in tone, but not notable. "Tallest building in between the lower mainland and Calgary" is not enough. JohnCD (talk) 14:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Geschichte (talk) 18:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. If this is deleted, then the related article Waterscapes Kelowna by the same contributor should probably also be put up for AFD. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. ArcAngel (talk) 23:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G11) – blatant promotion/spam. –MuZemike 01:53, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's a thin case for a G11 speedy, and I wouldn't object. There doesn't seem to be anything unusual or notable about this particular building that would differentiate it from other similar buildings in other similar cities, nor am I finding news articles or sources that would document notability. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 17:44, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.