Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skype version history


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete, criterion G12, copyright infringement. —C.Fred (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Skype version history

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable topic by itself, and not in any condition to merge into Skype. Poorly worded, barely passes as an article at all. Speedy already declined. BarkingFish 21:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I declined the speedy because there was sufficient context in the article to identify the subject, so criterion A1, lack of context, did not apply. That said, the article may wind up being speedy deleted under criterion G12: I haven't found clear evidence yet, but it feels like the text was copied from the Skype website. —C.Fred (talk) 21:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.