Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slammiversary IX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus, default to keep. Any editor may re-nominate this article for deletion if they deem so necessary. Deryck C. 19:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Slammiversary IX

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested WP:PROD, yet another future wrestling event; these keep being created WAY before they're notable. Future event; not yet notable; WP:CRYSTAL WP:V (same as Articles for deletion/Best in the World)  Chzz  ► 23:08, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Slammiversary. There is absolutely no information aside from venue and date.  There is no coverage in reliable sources.  -- Whpq (talk) 13:46, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: This is where Wikipedia policies have flaws, when people who know nothing of the subject say articles are not notable enough. The article has not been worked on enough is the issue as most of the editors who know what to do have stopped working. Not to sound big-headed but that includes myself who does this off and on. The subject matter is notable, believe me as I have made several TNA PPVs Good Article quality and Lockdown (2008) a Featured Article as I was really the only editor who expanded TNA's stuff to good qualities with guidelines. The events are covered in reliable sources such as Slam Sports, PWTorch, Wrestling Observer, The Sun, and WrestleView to name just a few. Then include magazine and news reports due to promotion leading up to the event.-- Will C  04:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - The article contains no references, and a search turns up none that I, and presumably the nominator, could find. If there are sources, by all means bring them forward.  But I will point out that the article, as it stands right now contains no useful information; the nominator's statement that it is too soon for an article is more than reasonable given this.  -- Whpq (talk) 10:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I think the phrase due to promotion leading up to the event says it all, really.  Chzz  ► 08:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: I don't know if you all knew this but it's something called GOOGLE Google Simply google the word Slammiversary IX and tons of links on the noticeability is there hell it's on in-demand which is the biggest ppv provider in the united states Zanwifi (talk) 23:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * comment - Can you explain which of those represent reliable sources covering this subject in some depth? -- Whpq (talk) 01:48, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Baseball   Watcher  23:42, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Slammiversary. My reason Articles for deletion/WWE Capitol Punishment. 177.24.77.131 (talk) 02:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Slammiversary until the event occurs and/or third party sources are available. Nikki  ♥  311   00:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to Slammiversary until the event occurs and/or third party sources are available. 189.98.101.128 (talk) 04:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No vote, but this event is due to happen on June 12, less than a month from now. If this is deleted and is resurrected after just a few days this discussion would've been pointless. – HTD  ( ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. ) 14:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep It's happening in less than a month, why freaking delete it?  Crisis  .  E  X  E   17:43, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep It's the next TNA PPV coming up. No deletion is necessary/redirect at all. - Sir Pawridge talk contribs 15:31, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.