Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SlashClone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:55, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

SlashClone
For something that attempts to be a concept surrounding slashdot the google hits are rather abysmal. under 300 just filtering out wikipedia and encyclopedia and even then some are mirrors of this article. Besides google hits there does not appear anything else substantiating this concept. Looks like neologism to me - Delete/Merge WhiteNight T 08:25, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - don't you think that a single slashdot in the world is more than enough? I do. -- Femmina 09:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB. Proto t c 12:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:WEB, neologism. Incognito 15:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Uh? Not notable? Doesn't exist? --Depakote 15:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Many of the "Delete" votes here are self-identified members of the GNAA. Cyde Weys votetalk 16:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * And so? -- Femmina 17:17, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge to Slashcode. The article is describing the word "Slashclone" as a neologism for clones of slashcode.  May also deserve mention at Slashdot.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 23:27Z 
 * Delete or merge per above. Eusebeus 23:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - see WP:WEB; non-notable. --Hosterweis 00:56, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge above Ashibaka tock 01:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 'Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Slashcode. Cyde Weys votetalk 04:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. *drew 08:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Idiotic in its existence.Cptchipjew 08:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.