Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slashbot Rhyme

Slashbot Rhyme was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 16 votes to delete, only 3 of which accepted merge. 1 vote by "AC" was disregarded&mdash;not signed in, not article author. Postdlf 14:53, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Slashbot Rhyme
Delete posting of some song or something some slashdot user posted on a thread once. It's amazing how self-important those people get, thinking everything they do is worthy of documentation. Postdlf 12:50, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * FIRST POST!.... I mean DELETE! -R. fiend 15:45, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Ugh...delete. What's next, an individual article for every "+5, funny" post? -- Ferkelparade &pi; 13:02, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Obviously not every post should be included, but this is now an established (if minor) part of modern Slashdot trolling, and is therefore worthy of inclusion in the Wikipedia. BTW I created the page, I am not Eberlin (although I cannot proffer any proof), neither am I one who trolls his posts on /. - I just find the phenomenon interesting. -- AC


 * Delete --Demonslave 14:23, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect or delete: to Slashdot. It's funny, but it's a rap, and it's unimportant and non-notable.  Wikipedia's readers, I pray, are not all Slashdotters.  This is not an item that makes sense outside a discussion of Slashdot, so let's putting it inside that discussion.  Geogre 15:03, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. This wiki is an encyclopedia not a wiki about some nerdy news website. We have enough of their articles already. No[[User_talk:norm|rm]] 15:39, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Cruft. If anyone mentions that Wikipedia is not paper, remember that Wikipedia is also not a junkyard. --Improv 15:44, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. At least the last line of the poem is fairly accurate vis-a-vis /. Terrapin 16:07, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yet again, someone with the delusion that rubbish on Slashdot is more than just rubbish. Average Earthman 16:13, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: rubbish. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:18, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Or, user can move to own page if desired. Do not redirect. Vanity. Original research. No potential ever to become encyclopedic. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 18:21, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Postdlf, et al, please try not to reduce yourself to generalizations about the Slashdot community (or any other community for that matter).  Its unconstructive and not necessary in the voting process.  Thanks.  --Radman1 20:22, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, this does not seem to have any potential to become an encyclopedic article. &mdash; siro  &chi;  o  23:50, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete Radman, et al, please do not preach, pontificate, or otherwise condescend to other Wikipedia editors. It is unconstructive and annoying.  Thanks. Wolfman 01:38, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * How about moving it to a new article on Slashdot (or even more general Geek) Humor (which isn't quite the same as Slashdot Trolling)? -- AC (Note:comment posted by User:195.92.67.78)
 * Delete or Merge into Slashdot trolling phenomena. It's good, but doesn't deserve its own article. --Desplesda 03:25, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge. Though, yes, isn't it interesting how people in online communities get self-important? - Ta bu shi da yu 10:16, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.