Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slater & Gordon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep, withdrawn by nominator -- nae'blis (talk) 21:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Slater & Gordon
Existing for nearly a year with no substantial information. Little noteriety and no references apart for it's own website. Delete čĥàñľōŕď 02:46, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

45 Google News articles on proposed class actions against Telstra and Multiplex see. Capitalistroadster 05:02, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- notable, nationwide law firm. - Longhair 03:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Perhaps Australia's most famous law firm.--cj | talk 04:12, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Highly notable Australian law firm. Michael Cannon published a book on them on Melbourne University Press in 1998 see.
 * I have expanded the article. No change of vote from keep. Capitalistroadster 06:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- cj | talk 04:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Capitalistroadster. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:12, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Great work with the expansion, Capitalistroadster! --Canley 11:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Capitalistroadster. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 12:36, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep has proper footnotes now. - Mgm|(talk) 13:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Always going to be keep. "Little noteriety[sic]"; you've gotta be kidding? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Excellent work (including by the AfD nominator) to fix this article and make it verifiable.--M @ r ē ino 19:04, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment:Well, at least it took a AfD nomination to get some info in there. How do I go about withdrawing a nom? čĥàñľōŕď 21:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you just did. :) Since it's a keep, I closed it myself as a non-admin (if this is a fsck-up, please tell me, folks). -- nae'blis (talk) 21:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.