Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slavianophile


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Redirect. Redwolf24 01:03, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Slavianophile

 * del. Attempt of neologism, 11 google. hits, original research. mikka (t) 18:43, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Slavophile -Satori 20:40, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * A redirect would be an endorsement of this strange and illiterate proposal. mikka (t) 21:00, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as per Mikkalai, which means no disrespect to an article's author who made several good contributions for now. --Irpen 22:26, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect - no harm of the redirect, might help some unfortunate russian-speaking soul to find the article abakharev 02:51, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * By this logic we may want redirects for unfortunate speakers of all foreign languages. Not to mention their typos and non-unique translitrerations: slavyanophile, slavianofile, slavyanofil, slavjanofil, slavianophil, slawianophyl,..... Redirect articles follow the same common sense rules as regular articles: notability and commonality. 17:16, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Do not see any harm in all tese spellings, just too lazy to do it myself, certainly would not delete if somebody would bother to create them abakharev 11:36, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Either delete or redirect. --Ghirlandajo 07:22, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Doesn't harm. --DmitryKo 15:11, 18 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.