Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slavica alphabet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Slavica alphabet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I happened to find this today, marked for zero citations since 2014 (but actually in existence since 2007), so I did a fair few web searches trying to find e.g. 'slavica 1987 igić -wiki', and got practically nothing (the name also coincides with a relatively popular given name). I don't think a separate article is warranted for an apparent scholarly work that has so little scholarly or real-world coverage. The author's article also has a bunch of cleanup tags... Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro,  and Serbia. Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I have formatted some of the references in the article text and what I found elsewhere. The article mentions Croatian newspapers. I think they will be hard to find online and, besides, I haven't tried to check Serbo-Croatian-language text. Some of what I find seems written by Igic himself. Novoslovnica mentions Slavica but seems self-published. --Error (talk) 19:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I checked those three and they're either from the author himself or a passing mention, and mostly outside of language-related fields as well. That's comparable to what I was able to find in Croatian sources myself. IOW it's not a lot. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 19:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. An exotic proposal that got nowhere and, even if it gathered some press attention at the time, it quickly withered away. Fails WP:LASTING importance. No such user (talk) 08:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.