Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slayer of Innocence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Slayer of Innocence

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book. TheGGoose (talk) 18:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find anything to show that this book is ultimately notable enough for an entry. It certainly exists but that isn't enough to pass notability guidelines. On a side note, a quick look at the original editor's article creations shows that this looks to be a common issue with his articles, but in all fairness these were mostly created before guidelines became more strict. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now - There's not a page for the Jim Conover and no other move target and my searches found nothing aside from passing mentions and a few news mentions. SwisterTwister   talk  04:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No claim of notability in the article. --Slashme (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.