Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleep Experts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:12, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Sleep Experts

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

They do not show significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. smu.edu and GDBEA are not mentioning the page subject. One other source is self business website, another is profile. Daringsmith (talk) 08:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with the nominator's analysis of the sources. Existence is not notability, and there is insufficient content in reliable sources to base an article. Local awards and brief mentions don't cut it. -- Kinu t/c 19:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources meeting WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't see any source that meets the criteria.--Art&#38;football (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.