Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleeper (2012 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 09:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Sleeper (2012 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film by non-notable director. No reliable independent sources to establish importance. Guy (Help!) 23:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  01:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  01:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * It has some coverage and reviews... but it seems the film has a touch more coverage on its wider DVD release title of Outback Revenge. Thank goodness too... fewer false positives. Back in a while.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * alts:
 * filmmaker:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * lead
 * lead


 * Comment: I'm finding some hits. I think that at the very least we can have an article for the director and redirect there. I found a review from HN.n, which is usable as a RS, and some minor chatter, which I've added to the page. I did find this German language review and it appears to be written by a staff member, but I can't tell much more than that since I'm completely unfamiliar with German language sources. I know that 28 Days Later Analysis doesn't really seem like it'd be a truly reliable source, but it is used as a source in this academic text. I typically don't use it on here, but I know that others have. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  14:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * There's a very bad draft for the director. It was G13'd but REFUNDed. Lots of SPA activity I think. Guy (Help!) 14:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * And better to establish a notability of his works before allowing that mess back.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep No compliance with WP:Before. You have put the cart before the horse.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 14:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * GIGO. Try Outback revenge for a search rather than Sleeper.  Try Bing.com instead of Google.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 14:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Issue was never whether this was a "good" movie or whether you would (a) pay to see it, (b) wait till you can buy it, (c) wait till you can rent it, or (d) wait till its on Netflix (or cable). IMO, those are the real reviews for films.  {:>{)> 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 18:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Looks sufficient to me.♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep notability established and shown in the improved article.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - notability established indeed.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Decently sourced and notable. Dimadick (talk) 07:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with above, but could definitely improve User:Layla, the remover


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.