Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleeper film 2008


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Hut 8.5 19:39, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Sleeper film 2008

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I originally marked for speedy as a hoax, however the author has added links. Here's the problem...none of the people listed are mentioned anywhere as being involved in the project...in fact Kym Jackson is in the middle of three other projects at this time and this still isn't mentioned. It appears to be a really elaborate hoax with a fantastic web site...even if it's not a hoax it still fails WP:V and WP:N and WP:Crystal. No objection to recreation if it's ever released and reviewed by a major news outlet. LegoTech &middot;(t)&middot;(c) 06:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless better sources are found. I couldn't verify Scott Levy's appearance - his website doesn't mention this film. On the other hand there's a lone newspaper article. Anyway, WP:CRYSTAL applies. Huon (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Nick Dowling (talk) 11:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The one local news reference is not sufficient to confer notability. Kevin (talk) 00:17, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. ukexpat (talk) 21:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.