Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleeping Dogs Lie (2005 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 15:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Sleeping Dogs Lie (2005 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources; IMDB doesn't count. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 03:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment There is a review in Dread Central and announcement/casting reported on MTV website and recycled on other sites. But I'm not sure that's enough to meet WP:NFILMS. However be aware that Rotten Tomatoes seems to confuse this (directed by Stuart Lessner) with the Bobcat Goldthwait film Sleeping Dogs Lie (2006 film) so don't rely on the reviews listed there. This film does have notable stars, including the great Edward Asner, so it would be good to have info on it somewhere on Wikipedia. Possibly it could be merged to article on star Brad Wilk? --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 20:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. I found a newspaper article about the film, though admittedly a local newspaper doesn't do a whole lot to establish notability.  Still, we've got enough coverage to at least make a fair argument now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.