Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleeping States (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SK #1 (admittedly out of process since I participated here, any editor should revert if they feel this is out of line) j⚛e deckertalk 18:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Sleeping States
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Created by WP:SPA and has been tagged for notability for over six years, unresolved. Deleted at 2006 AfD as copyvio. Boleyn (talk) 15:50, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - coverage at Pitchfork Media, The Quietus , Clash , Allmusic , Exclaim! , Popmatters , The Guardian , and NME . Subject meets WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC.  Gongshow   talk  23:41, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Gongshow's sources appear to reach GNG. --j⚛e deckertalk 05:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn Thanks for your great work, ; it seems that at its last AfD, it was WP:TOOSOON, but they now pass the bar. Boleyn (talk) 07:34, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.