Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleeze Beez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. L Faraone  05:00, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Sleeze Beez

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I tagged this in October 2008 for needing citations. However between that time and the last edit (October 2010) almost nothing of substance has been added to the article. (see dif) It is marked as a stub, which is fine, but ultimately it comes down to in two years the article was never been expanded or really sourced. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article does need citations, but the band is notable, having had a Billboard 200-charting album. I'll add a couple of allmusic sources while I'm here. 28bytes (talk) 02:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Citations added. 28bytes (talk) 02:40, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep (disclaimer - I am article creator) - lack of citations is a signal to look for them, not to nominate for AFD. This band passes WP:BAND and while low tier on the notability scale, still passes the test. I have added a couple more citations and slightly expanded the article. Exxolon (talk) 13:54, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - It took a while for the article to get up to proper standards and it could still use some expansion. But the band achieved a little bit of notability and that should be enough for a basic stub article. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 13:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Overall Comments: As I said, I am not against the stub at all. And I did not send it here because I have never heard of this band. I actually reviewed Screwed Blued & Tattooed back in the day for a national publication and liked it. Unfortunately what I like, or who I know did such and such or said such and such, is not good enough for Wikipedia. This article got sent here based on policy and was tagged/warned two years ago. Exxolon said: lack of citations is a signal to look for them ,but as this was tagged two years ago why didn't they expand it two year ago? Had that been done I would not have sent it here. With some articles it takes getting sent to an AfD before the issues can be fixed. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.