Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slenke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied as G7 (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  03:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Slenke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication that the topic satisfies WP:NCORP.  Super Mario  Man  ( Talk ) 18:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

I respect your opinion but from my perspective, we should keep this article as it is historical, informational and is about a company that people would like to know background on. User talk:Jedaaai ( Talk ) 18:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing in the article shows that it meets WP:CORP. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Article is on the same lines as articles for companies and products like Basecamp, Asana and Wrike. I would respectfully suggest keeping it as it provides historical and informational value. Hamza1011 (talk) 18:53, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

I agree with above opinion of keeping it, to me it adds value to Wikipedia, because Wikipedia is providing valuable historical/background information about a commercial organization which stands out in its respected industry and used by many organizations. • Jedaaai (talk) 19:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Exactly. We're looking for adequate evidence that it does stand out. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * In my opinion we do have adequate evidence that it does stand out. For example one of the referenced source is from The Globe and Mail, mentioning the company and the founder as up and coming of Ottawa in 2013. 2nd source that stand out to me is the article from October 2015 calling the company one of the highlights at the event that the article was about. I like this healthy discussion.  —Jedaaai (talk) 19:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as several of the listed sources merely consist of passing mentions, press releases and otherwise are simply not in-depth third-party solidly enough for a better notable article. Also, the best I found were only press releases including republished so there's simply nothing for a considerably better article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  21:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * As a reader, I found this article to be useful. So Keep It  —Layson (talk) 21:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC) — User:Layson101 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete - Per WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Apart from a few sources that reference simple funding/routine topics that do not cover this company in-depth, there does not seem to exist any sources at all that would satisfy WP:GNG. The sources must be reliable, secondary, cover the article subject in-depth and be focused on the subject, and significant coverage must exist so that original research is not required in order to fully write the article. These sources do not exist, and hence this subject does not meet the required parameters per WP:GNG.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.