Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slenke (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ignoring the SPAs, as we're supposed to do,, clear consensus   DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Slenke
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Google news returns one result: PRnewswire. Article has sources but they are mostly low-quality PR pages. The only solid ref is from the Globe and mail. Without diverse sources the company fails WP:GNG and is distinctly promotiional in nature as well. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 02:04, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as a somewhat newly founded company with nothing else for actual solid notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Got some good sources, including a interview i.e. Globe and Mail, Interview with Startup Ottawa and Virtual Strategy Magazine Aeronaut225 (talk) 15:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note that Aeronaut225 is a SPA.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a good start, it has some good references and it will improve further in due time. Fwb tc (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin That makes two keeps from accounts less than a day old. Just keeping track.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep The reliable and verifiable sources clearly about the subject meet the notability standard.Rollingtwister (talk) 16:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note to Closing admin that makes three keeps from new accounts-- oldest is two days or so. It's amazing how these new poeple are so comitted to AfD's! HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Clearly this is a non-notable article given the coverage available as of now. Moreover, the SPA cases above that has pointed out compound the reason for a speedy delete since they are out here to break Wikipedia policy. DarthVader (talk) 00:58, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.