Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slightly damned


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  01:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Slightly damned
More from my webcomic nn watchlist is Slightly damned, found here. There are 150 links for "Slightly damned" although none of these are from anything approaching a reliable source, and quite a few of them are irrelevent to the subject. This is not notable, I doubt the entire art site http://www.raizap.com/ would pass WP:WEB let alone one of its webcomics. - Hahnch e  n 00:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * del nn. `'mikka (t) 02:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * keep This comic is in the top 100 at Buzzcomic.net and it's online counter is 1500 shy of a million visits. Moridin 04:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I've already concurred on the delete nom, but I am curious where you found the rating on Buzzcomic.net. I visited the site and it appears to be a directory site, not a ratings service.  Tychocat 06:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Buzzcomix.net definitely has rankings; they're on the front page. (This webcomic is currently 69th.) It and TopWebComics.com are (AFAICT) the main webcomics directories/ranking sites; both rank webcomics based (mainly) on number of user votes. (This has its flaws - webcomics which don't go in for that sort of thing are noticably missing - but enough webcomics take part that the rankings are still useful, as long as you understand and take into account how they work.) - makomk 16:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Keep noms may want to check WP:WEB rather than invent new policy or guidelines.  Fails WP:WEB for lacking non-trivial third-party articles about the webcomic; I found a lot of directory listings and a couple of blogs.  Google shows only 149 distinct hits out of a weak 735 general hits.  Alexa traffic shows a three-month average of somewhere about 1.4 millionth.  I don't believe Google is the final arbiter of notability, and Alexa admits its accuracy can be shaky when the ratings are that low, but I think it's symptomatic when a website can't even break a thousand on a general Google hits.  Tychocat 06:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Tychocat. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 07:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above (Doesn't meet WP:WEB) Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't look like it meets WP:WEB -- makomk 16:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Buzzcomix is not a reliable independent source. Ohconfucius 01:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Heimstern Läufer 22:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.