Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slim Goodbuzz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 09:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Slim Goodbuzz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable anonymous author. Only links are primary sources. Topic seems to be just a advert hook to a blog page. Doesn't seem to meet notability requirements. Mikeblas (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. THF (talk) 09:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 00:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, X  clamation point  00:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment I have this feeling of deja vu. Mandsford (talk) 01:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nom, doesn't seem notable. Hippopotamus (talk) 04:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, unnotable.  Math Cool  10  Sign here! 05:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete of minor local notability at best, as even the article pretty much admits. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  10:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.