Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sling Slang Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Sling Slang Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Obscure label that briefly released music by unknown Connecticut performers. The company appears to have been defunct for years, and the very little coverage it received while it was operational was strictly from local newspapers. It certainly fails WP:CORP. And Adoil Descended (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Delete Non-noteable record company - unable to locate reliable sources for notability. Per WP:CORP delete. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 01:32, 22 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:18, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I believe CORP is a horrible notability guideline for record labels, but this isn't a notable label.... yet. Quite a bit of internet chatter, but nothing in reliable sources, and it hasn't yet developed a roster of "many" notable artists.    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 17:02, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- WP:PROMO article on a minor label. WP:TOOSOON applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.