Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slings and arrows comic guide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite 00:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Slings and arrows comic guide

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I believe that this article may serve to promote a particular product rather than to describe it in an encyclopedic manner. The article may be written by someone associated with the product, creating a conflict of interest. Richard Cavell (talk) 22:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

I have revised the article in order to describe it in an encyclopedic manner. If you see anything that you would like to change, feel free. Hopefully this clears this conflict up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjstensrud (talk • contribs) 22:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry that my previous comment was unsigned. In my rush to get it up I left it unsigned. [User:Cjstensrud] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjstensrud (talk • contribs) 22:56, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of verifiability. Please look at the verifiability policy as to what an article needs to be verified and hence be notable enough for inclusion. MuZemike  ( talk ) 06:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks coverage in reliable sources. no reviews. no indication of notability. nothing that satisfies WP:BK. Duffbeerforme (talk) 10:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete It speaks well of the author for genuinely trying to improve the article during the debate, but this just doesn't seem to pass our book guidelines. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.