Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sloan Work and Family Research Network at Boston College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. seresin | wasn't he just...? 17:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Sloan Work and Family Research Network at Boston College

 * – (View AfD)

Notability concerns - I was only able to find trivial media coverage in reliable sources.--Addhoc (talk) 17:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect. Until today, the article was a redirect to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. I don't believe a redirect of that type is unreasonable, and restored that redirect in lieu of a speedy delete earlier today. I concur with Addhoc, in that I can find few sources that confirm the organization's existance, with none proving notability. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 19:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. In some parts, the article is pure spam. Basketball  110   what famous people say  23:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * There is evidence in its existence through the Sloan Foundation and also through Boston College - both credible resources. sbmorrison 11:22, 3, March 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbmorrison (talk • contribs) 16:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Clean up - I would rather clean it up than delete it. Tagged as such. Not sure where to begin. Bearian (talk) 01:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Master of Puppets   Call me MoP! ☺  22:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect I can't find much evidence of notability, so I agree with Ultraexactzz. Master of Puppets   Call me MoP! ☺  22:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect until outside sources are found. Blast Ulna (talk) 23:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a merge and redirect would be appropriate, but an outright deletion certainly would have no positive effect on the encyclopedia. Kurt Weber ( Go Colts! ) 23:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The page has been cleaned up and outside sources have been added to the site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Osartor (talk • contribs) 11:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.