Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sloot

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 17:51, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

Sloot
Neologism: "The term first began appearing in online chats in early 2005." -- Scott ei&#960; + 1 = 0  23:34, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. This is a natural candidate for speedy deletion: nonsense from Anonymous User:141.161.125.211 (no other edits) which takes more people's time to delete than it will to invent more of the same. To foist it on Wiktionary simply fills that site with garbage.
 * Unsigned vote from User:Wetman
 * Keep. This is a valid phrase, I've seen it around and used it myself for nearly a year now.
 * Unsigned vote from User:68.40.57.10
 * Keep. I am the Anonymous user who entered the word. Sorry, I wasn't registered at that time. I have added other terms that are valid (The Michigan Review), though anonymously as well. I have seen the term sloot from multiple sources since early last year. My original "2005" reference was a typo. There are many people these days who count as sloots, the phenomenon is getting stronger with every new person who signs on to match.com, etc, and there is no other word to describe this. Perhaps I or someone else can beef it up, and/or move it to wiktionary.
 * Unsigned vote from User:Ztrawhcs. User has only 4 edits, all to this section and sloot article.
 * Deloote. -Sean Curtin 00:54, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-encyclopedic. Rmhermen 00:55, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Curps 17:55, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A dicdef for a neologism that appeared in a campus newspaper isn't notable. Sloot is no Smoot. --TenOfAllTrades 19:09, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * D3l3t3 and unravel s0ckpuppet$. - Lucky 6.9 23:46, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg |  (Talk)  23:01, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Josh Cherry 02:56, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.