Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sloppy Cronkite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - brenneman  06:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Sloppy Cronkite
Non-noteworthy neologism. Contested prod. Shimeru 21:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete Per nom. We're not going to make a new page for every single John Stewart joke. Pete.Hurd 21:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Why not? He obviously has the Midas touch; everything he says must be written down and publicized.  Not only that, each phrase needs its own page on Wikipedia.  ShadowHalo 06:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete borderline speedy as nonsense/context. JuJube 02:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The "first known reference" was yesterday. There is no way this is notable yet . . . if ever.  janejellyroll 06:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. A redirect might be OK, but not an article. Guy (Help!) 10:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I (heart) Jon Stewart, but that's no reason for an article for every phrase that issues forth from his mouth. -- Whpq 21:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, fancruft. MastCell 21:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Jon Stewart used it once on air. Not notable.&mdash;Perceval 21:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete No assertion of notability whatsoever. ShadowHalo 06:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.