Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sloppy seconds (sexual practice)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. I misstated that this was a neologism. I will return with a re-nomination later. (non-admin closure) Mark Schierbecker (talk) 22:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Sloppy seconds (sexual practice)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It seems like a non-notable neologism. What all is there to add to this beyond a dictionary definition. Maybe this? Mark Schierbecker (talk) 06:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Although I would hope that most people know what is meant by Sloppy Seconds. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 08:01, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - sorry but this seems plenty notable.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  08:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 16:57, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Satisfies WP:GNG. Also not a neologism, unless it's still considered "relatively new" after 50 years of documented usage in print. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.