Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slovenia–South Korea relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Slovenia–South Korea relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

These two countries do not have any bilateral relationship to speak of, at least not one covered in independent, reliable sources. They do not maintain embassies in each others capitals. This stub is currently unreferenced and content free, and I see no prospect for worthwhile expansion, particularly if the notability guidelines are given any weight. Bali ultimate (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. The Ogre (talk) 15:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 15:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - random pairing with not a shred of notability indicated. - Biruitorul Talk 15:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Yet again, non-notable, not even to have resident ambassadors. -- BlueSquadron Raven  16:00, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep --Mr Accountable (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Why? - Biruitorul Talk 16:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, why not? Seems like a perfectly useful article. --Mr Accountable (talk) 17:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * See WP:ITSUSEFUL for why you need more than that. - Biruitorul Talk 17:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The mere fact that two countries exist or once existed and had ambassadors or consuls or representation through a third country does not mean that we need articles such as this. Did they form alliances, or become major trading partners, or go to war, or anything else which would have caused there to be significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources about their "relations" satisfying notability?  Wikipedia is not a directory. Edison (talk) 16:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Response They are probably trading partners, and will continue to be so in the future. --Mr Accountable (talk) 17:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * "Probably"? Is that the new WP:RS standard? - Biruitorul Talk 17:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - South Korea's representation for Slovenia is in Vienna. Slovenia's is in Tokyo. There's no better way of saying that a relationship is non-notable than by both countries not having an embassy. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  19:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Have a look at Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations, there is a discussion about a general policy on such articles. By the way, my vote goes for delete here, there are no diplomatic relations to speak of in a separate article. --Tone 21:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete again a random country pairing with no evidence of significant trade or diplomatic relationship. LibStar (talk) 00:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.