Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slovenia – South Africa relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Slovenia – South Africa relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. non resident embassies. Only could 1 article but it's a "would like to cooperate" type article, otherwise most coverage is based on relations on the football field. . LibStar (talk) 05:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Relations between the two aforementioned countries are not notable enough to deserve their own article. One (talk) 05:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country. Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. Thanks.  Ikip (talk) 15:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * no need to yell, mr. caps. Mandsford (talk) 23:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - far too slight a "relationship" to pass WP:N. - Biruitorul Talk 16:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The fact there is no established embassy in South Africa.Dr. Blofeld (talk) 16:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the news search turned up articles about sports. When the South African FM swung through central Europe, she (diplomatically) said that the relations "had plenty of room to expand"., kind of what one would say about a vacant lot.  Mandsford (talk) 23:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge  the bilateral articles into one Foreign relations of country X by country article per country. Edison (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article topic not shown to be notable through independent coverage. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  16:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since no reliable sources discuss this relationship. Good news is there's nothing of "value" to lose here (unsourced stub without an assertion even of notability).Bali ultimate (talk) 03:37, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.