Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slovenian Pirate Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   trout the relister for not seeing that the nomination was withdrawn. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Slovenian Pirate Party

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

I removed the db-corp from the article because notability is asserted by the sole reference, http://www.vecer.com/clanek2010110505590554. I cannot read Slovenian so I am uncertain as to whether this article provides nontrivial coverage about the Slovenian Pirate Party. Furthermore, the article states: "The Slovenian Pirate Party has first appeared in the Slovenian media in 2009." A Google News Archive search returns no results, though a search with a Slovenian query might be more fruitful. This political party may fail Notability. I will withdraw this nomination if participants can uncover significant coverage in at least two reliable sources. Cunard (talk) 02:10, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Well a quick search reveals that RTV Slovenija had a news on it in 2009 about it being founded and so did 24ur .--Sporti (talk) 06:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for locating these sources. They should be enough to establish notability. Keep. Cunard (talk) 07:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - significantly covered by reliable sources (RTV Slovenija, 24ur, Večer). --Eleassar my talk 09:26, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep, noteworthy political party. -- Cirt (talk) 00:29, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.