Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SlowHTTPChunked


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G7 — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

SlowHTTPChunked

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently novel DDoS technique which only exists as a single proof of concept posted to Github last month. Fails WP:GNG, can't even find any Google results which aren't Wikipedia mirrors. McGeddon (talk) 11:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * This attack techniques is new, therefore it will take time before google will able to index relevant and reliable sources as eForensics Magazine, Hakin9 Magazine, communities and others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frogteam (talk • contribs) 12:51, 6 June 2014‎
 * Delete. Too soon for an article if it's that new of a concept.  Wait a while, let it appear in reliable sources, and then recreate the article if it becomes notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy close and delete - looks like the original author has now attempted to blank the article, which per WP:G7 can be taken as a request that the article be speedily deleted. --McGeddon (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.