Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slow Dance (poem)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  00:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Slow Dance (poem)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This can never be anything more than a stub. The poem is only known due to chain e-mails, which usually mis-credit it. We're not snopes, let them do the job. (Note: earlier PROD rejected) Ego White Tray (talk) 01:45, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Easily passes GNG, and the level of vandalism to the article reinforces the level of interest in this topic. There is no policy of rejecting topics just because Snopes covers them too, nor any reason to think that this stub can't or won't be expanded. Disclosures of interest: I am the original author of this stub, and the challenger of the PROD, which was based on a vandalised version of the article, see Talk:Slow Dance (poem). Andrewa (talk) 02:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Nothing to say the stub can't be expanded, and it passes the general guideline. camerontregantalk 07:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter   (gas)  @ 21:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, notable topic, room for expansion. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.