Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slowcoaster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:08, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Slowcoaster

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Very little evidence of significance let alone notability. The few sources that can still be found are local and do not convey notability. Several sources are dead and could not be traced in the internet archive. New searches found nothing that had not already been listed. Article was created in 2006 by an SPA which also gives concern about COI. Fails WP:BAND by a very wide margin  Velella  Velella Talk 14:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Velella  Velella Talk  14:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 14:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficient evidence of notability. Doczilla  @SUPERHEROLOGIST 18:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, surprisingly. Since the strongest notability claims here (ECMAs, rotation on Much Music) are almost 20 years old, I ran a ProQuest search since 20-year-old sourcing wouldn't be expected to Google well, and found considerably more quality in-depth coverage of them than I was expecting for a band I've never personally heard of. Gimme an hour or two to fix the article, and Bob'll be your uncle. Bearcat (talk) 18:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Did the dirty deed. Article now cites 14 sources, from a variety of media outlets not at all limited to Cape Breton Island or even Nova Scotia. Bearcat (talk) 19:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep as the article has been improved with the addition of multiple reliable sources coverage references Atlantic306 (talk) 18:07, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements by Bearcat. Suonii180 (talk) 00:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources and additions (courtesy of Bearcat). Band clearly meets GNG (and GNG is basically just rehashed in NBAND 1). Samsmachado (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.