Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sludge Crawler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Sludge Crawler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail notability guidelines, no sources, reliable or otherwise. he who am are is myself  23:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮ JAaron95 Talk  13:34, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Game released Nov. 24, 2006. Approximately 900 have played it according to the download page at cnet.com, which is the only reliable source I could find, except that this source only reproduces the publishers description. All other appearances online appear to be blogs and wikis. Article is unreferenced. Prhartcom (talk) 13:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. – czar   23:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete- software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS coverage. As a download site, cnet is not independent. A redirect to publisher Manifesto Games would also be reasonable.Dialectric (talk) 04:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.