Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sluizer Speaks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Sluizer Speaks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable film fails WP:NFP. have no references, fails WP:NFSOURCES, not featured anywhere, no major award, fails WP:NFO. Prod removed by author who made very few contribs apart from the article. After he removed prod the only sources he relied upon are user generated IMDb and YouTube trailer. I can't find any source that even mention this film in full sentence. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Important festival information and links to heir websites have been added. Information of and a link to an interview by the dutch film institute have been added. Production-information on the odd circumstances of this film have been added. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment the festival is a general film festival where the film was also mentioned like any other films there both notable and non notable. Their website that you added is further evidence no independent source that reported about this film. And for WP:GNG to be met independent and of course, reliable sources are necessary. The reference section is still empty, while you are busy populating external link section. None of the points of WP:NFILM is also met. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - In looking for coverage, the best I could manage was this article which I would not categorize as substantial coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.