Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smaart Friend Finder App


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Smaart Friend Finder App

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Two-year-old article with no independent references, and largely promotional in tone. No evidence for notability. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 18:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:55, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No indication of notability. Article lacks 3rd party RS refs. A search reveals only blogs/PR posts about the software, no RS coverage. Page was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:51, 4 August 2013 (UTC)




 * Keep Here a a couple sources that establish notability:, . Article is already tagged with advert but that's not a reason to delete. ~KvnG 00:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 23:04, 11 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - The web page listed in the article as the "Official website" appears to be about some other software, and the web page called "App store review" has a notice at the top that the App has been removed from the Android market. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 00:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The sources mentioned by do not appear to be reliable, and seem to be parroting some talking points from the developers when the app was released. My search does not show significant coverage in reliable, independent sources.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  00:57, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.