Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small Mining Encyclopedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Small Mining Encyclopedia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Potential copyvio from ; WP:N not established; promotional editing by User:Білецький В.С., who self-identifies as the editor of this work. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 20:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NBOOK. 45+ Google hits, most of it sourced to Wikipedia. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. PianoDan (talk) 18:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No grounds. This encyclopedia. Please show in talk page if some facts seems to be disputable.--Білецький В.С. (talk) 15:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No one's disputing any facts. What's disputed is the article's notability, which is the main ground for inclusion in Wikipedia. If you can produce two independent sources for the enclopedia's notability (e.g. reviews), then it's off the hook. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 17:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Lteratura is, but in Ukrainian language. --Білецький В.С. (talk) 18:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Book reviews? Ukrainian is OK if there are book reviews in Ukrainian, published in reliable sources. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 20:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - can't see any evidence that this passes WP:NBOOK. Stalwart 111  13:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.