Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smallman Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  10:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Smallman Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced article about a small (no pun intended) independent record label. Record labels are not accorded an automatic presumption of standalone notability in the absence of proper reliable sourcing just because they've had notable artists on them — to qualify for a Wikipedia article, a record label has to be the subject of enough media coverage to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. But on both Google and ProQuest, I can't find any coverage about the record label at all — all I get is glancing namechecks of its existence in coverage of the bands that happen to have been on it. As well, there's a bit of an advertorial tint here, making it rather unsurprising that the original creator was User:Smallman records and the most frequent editor after that was User:Smallman. There's simply nothing here that gets it past our notability requirements for record labels at all, and no quality sourcing to repair it with. Bearcat (talk) 16:43, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom's point, non notable lable without indicated significance.--SamHolt6 (talk) 14:38, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:NMUS.   Dr Strauss   talk   08:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.