Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smalltimore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. m.o.p 18:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Smalltimore

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Negative term, barely sourced. No indication given that this is anything more than a neologism. TexasAndroid (talk) 16:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Obvious Delete as a poorly-sourced neologism. --Miskwito (talk) 17:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - (1) Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Article consists of a dictionary definition only.  (2) Non-notable.  No evidence of the term receiving significant coverage in reliable sources.  (3) Unsourcable.  No sources currently in the article and no evidence that it is capable of being sourced.  (4) Soapbox.  The purpose of the article appears to be to attack Baltimore and its residents. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:01, 2 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.