Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smallville Season 7


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 21:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Smallville Season 7

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP is not a crystal ball. Basically a summary of the end of season six, and total speculation on the next season. No bias against recreation in the Fall when the season actually starts, but for now this is total crystalballery. TexasAndroid 16:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - According to the main article Smallville (TV series), a seventh season has been officially announced, so information on that announcement should be put here and the article kept as a placeholder for the series which is presumably now in pre-production at the least. However the speculation and fanboi comments in the article should be removed. Ben W Bell   talk  17:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep as per Ben. Dalejenkins 18:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete until more concrete facts are found on season 7. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 19:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep -- Mostly per, but this article really needs some expansion and addition of reputable sourced citations. Smee 09:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 20:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - pretty much the only concrete fact known about season seven at the moment is that it will happen; we don't even know when that will be. The only other factual part of the article is the brief recap of the end of the previous season, which is unnecessary.   The rest of the article is a mix of speculation and "statements" lacking any citation.  Should be deleted until more concrete information is available, at which point it can be recreated as a proper article with proper factual content.  --Tailkinker 19:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.