Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartFocus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 02:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

SmartFocus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spam article created by single-purpose account for promotional purposes. Questionable notability and weak references. Citobun (talk) 10:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. I don't see any reliable sources that provide in-depth coverage. Some fringe trade journals, PR/marketing websites - yes. Mentions in passing in them? Yes. Notable? No. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. sst✈(discuss) 10:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing in searches to show they pass either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.