Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartOwner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Alex ShihTalk 01:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

SmartOwner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR-driven or passing mentions. Previously speedy deleted, and then immediately recreated. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Lacking depth of coverage. Promotional tonality. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The nom has given sufficient reason to have this removed. I could also not find reliable sources to have this as an article. The language used is more brochure sounding thus can't have stint here on Wikipedia. Kagundu  Talk To Me  09:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Too soon: if the company survives the test of time and has sources besides promotion, then maybe some day try again. Otherwise not remarkable. W Nowicki (talk) 19:26, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.