Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smarter Agent, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Smarter Agent, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Purely promotional; no context of notability presented. Jacona (talk) 19:31, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:47, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Nominator seems to fail to understand that WP:BEFORE requires legitimate efforts to look for sourcing before nominating an article. The sources added, and the many more available online, establish notability for the firm, which both provides a major real estate search tool and has acted to vigorously defend its IP against some of the biggest firms in the industry. Alansohn (talk) 19:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the opinion on my understanding of WP:BEFORE, but I do understand what sort of sourcing should be considered before nominating an article for deletion. While there is some WP:ROUTINE run-of-the-mill stuff, and PR items, this company appeared and disappeared without being noticed by any significant publications. Jacona (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * , this AfD was filed out of pure malicious spite. You have a clear obligation to look for sources and you failed completely. The significant coverage has lasted for years and ignoring these sources by calling this "Routine" is completely and totally false. It's well past time to end this proven pattern of persistent stalking and harassment; the blatant failure to ignore policy only exacerbates matters. Alansohn (talk) 13:24, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow. This AfD was filed because the article was completely unsourced, and the coverage found was trivial and routine.  Instead of resorting to personal attacks, perhaps we should consider the opinions of other editors. Your allegations of stalking are completely untrue.  It appears that they are just WP:ASPERSIONS cast to try to "win" arguments by means other than following policy.  They have no place here. Jacona (talk) 13:59, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * All you've done is ignore policy and simply disregard the ample reliable and verifiable sources about the company. If you don't have the basic honesty to acknowledge that there is a proven pattern of persistent stalking and harassment, please stop actively lying about it and move on to harass others. Alansohn (talk) 14:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Please, personal attacks don't belong on this AfD page, and they are in any case baseless. I've never been blocked. I don't have any trouble with other editors. Instead of personal attacks, perhaps you'd care to comment about why you think this article belongs on Wikipedia.  Your constructive comments would be welcome, and you can have as much say as you like.  Please don't make every article I edit a WP:BATTLEGROUND, this is quite Jacona (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * See above, where I commented that "The sources added, and the many more available online, establish notability for the firm, which both provides a major real estate search tool and has acted to vigorously defend its IP against some of the biggest firms in the industry." The battleground that you have created is best demonstrated by your proven pattern of persistent stalking and harassment. Have a shred of honesty and decency, admit your mistake, move on and harass someone else. Even better, stop stalking anyone. Alansohn (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe deckertalk 15:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.