Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smartnet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Smartnet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I PRODded on the grounds that I was unable to find independent sourcing to meet WP:ORG. contested the PROD, so bringing it here for further discussion. I'm honestly not sure whether this should meet WEB or ORG notability guidelines, but a BEFORE doesn't identify coverage for either. Star  Mississippi  14:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  14:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  14:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  14:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  14:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, no SIGCOV here. Alimovvarsu (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The site used to be quite popular with folks who work in 3D modelling for animation and videogames. Perhaps it still is, but I retired from that business. Providing reference images of nude models is a bit of a niche market, and I doubt that there is much if any coverage in the general press, although perhaps in some specialized (trade) publications. I don't see any way in which this topic would pass WP:NCORP.


 * Delete - website article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. Smartnet is also the name of a Cisco networking product, making searching more challenging. A search turned up PR and incidental mentions for Smartnet and 3d.sk, but no significant WP:RS coverage. Current version is basically a linkfarm.Dialectric (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG  and WP:ORG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.