Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smash Champs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  14:07, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Smash Champs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Video game of unclear notability. There have been reviews but that's par for the course for new games. Search of Google brings up 77 unique results, mostly places to download it. Prod contested. ... disco spinster   talk  20:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:23, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Plenty of RS coverage, including Engadget, GameZebo, Pocket Gamer, and 148apps. JOE BRO  64  21:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete  - this article is written almost like an advertisement. Vorbee (talk) 08:38, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - article just about meets GNG with the sources above  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:48, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:35, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Bad/unnecessary relist in my opinion (number of votes being 2 vs 2 is not equal to consensus and the arguments of the nominator AND the other delete !voter have been refuted with sources shown and the tone of the article is not WP:PROMO anymore ). Passes WP:GNG per having coverage in multiple reliable sources that are also listed on WikiProject Video games/Sources.
 * Pocket Gamer https://www.pocketgamer.com/articles/062334/smash-champs/
 * 148Apps (which is a situational one but is applicable here) http://www.148apps.com/reviews/smash-champs-review/
 * Engadget https://www.engadget.com/2014/11/07/smash-champs-is-stunning-unique-and-action-packed/
 * While not listed, Windows Central as well since there is no consensus either way https://www.windowscentral.com/smash-champs-windows-phone-game-review
 * Not really the most notable mobile game for sure, especially compared to Subway Surfers which is the other game from the same developer, but enough to pass the guidelines. There have been reviews but that's par for the course for new games is ignoring what WP:GNG is. Not all the new games get reviews, especially mobile ones because there is too many of them nowadays. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep article seems to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 20:59, 5 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.