Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smeet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  07:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Smeet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of this article may not meet the notability and web notability guidelines.  'Ridge (  Converse,  Create , &  Fascinate  ) 21:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.   'Ridge  (  Converse,  Create , &  Fascinate  ) 21:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep There are a few journal articles about the game that would satisfy WP:GNG:
 * There is also this journal article which seems to not be independent but may have citations or other details that could be useful:
 * Jumpytoo Talk 03:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * There is also this journal article which seems to not be independent but may have citations or other details that could be useful:
 * Jumpytoo Talk 03:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Jumpytoo Talk 03:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: Article is good enough to pass WP:GNG with reliable sources indicated by Jumpytoo. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 15:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per comments above NemesisAT (talk) 22:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.